Posts Tagged 'robert scoble'

Information Tids Bits About Media and Technology

Tim O'ReillyImage via Wikipedia

– Apple got a new VP of Product Design – Doug Field from Segway. Tim O’Reilly has an interesting observation about this move.

Friendfeed is under fire:

HeySpread provides cool service for multisite video distribution and encoding. Business model is similar to wordpress.com – users buy credits for encoding, watermarking etc. Read more at their blog

Have a great day!

Advertisements

Qik, Flixwagon – Scoble is wrong

Robert Scoble published a thoughtful post on Techcrunch, regarding the future of live mobile broadcasting. While Robert is one of the smartest people in the social media circles, I have to say that he missed the point here.

Robert saying that Qik and Flixwagon has no future cause Kyte already has it all:

Here’s why I think Kyte will dominate over Qik and Flixwagon:

  1. The distribution system that Kyte has built is much better than either Qik or Flixwagon. Translation: the embeddable player that Kyte.tv has is much better than Qik or Flixwagon, more on that in a second.
  2. The chat room that Kyte has built is much better than Qik or Flixwagon and can be participated in from other cell phones, something that Qik and Flixwagon can’t do.
  3. The ability to mix videos from your webcam, live videos streaming from your web cam, recorded videos from camcorders, or from places like YouTube, along with both recorded and streamed videos from your cell phone goes way beyond what Qik and Flixwagon have done today.
  4. Kyte.tv can play videos on an iPhone today. Neither Qik or Flixwagon can do that.
  5. Kyte.tv can play videos on a Nokia today. Both from your recordings and other people’s. Neither Qik or Flixwagon can do that.
  6. Kyte.tv is partially funded and supported by Nokia. That might not sound like a big deal, but it is. Nokia is using Kyte’s service internally too, and I’m sure Nokia is giving Kyte better engineering support than it’s giving Qik or Flixwagon.
  7. Kyte.tv is way ahead of Qik and Kyte in getting real mainstream celebrities like 50 cent on its service, which means its growth is way stronger.

I believe that content, not features, will win the market.

Dominance in live streaming, mobile and online, is not based on features. Look at the live streaming business – a lot of the competitors have the same feature set, and if not, it takes couple of months for laggers to play catch up. In this industry, features cannot win the market, as it is too flat to gain market share.

It is content strategy that will win the battle. The market player which will have the best video content, the best talents, and the best fit between live events and the mobile streaming application, will dominate this field. Only if Kyte would manage to strengthen point 7 in Scoble’s argument, they will win the market. But, it is just a matter of smart business development moves from their competitors, to change the market situation.

Why Twitter Shouldn’t Charge Super Users

Robert Scoble asks if Twitter should charge super users, a concept raised by Om Malik. For those of you who aren’t using this service – it is a much hyped notification platform that I wrote about in the past.

Well, NO. Twitter shouldn’t charge super users such as Scoble because they the soul of the service and its best promoters. When Scoble, Pulver and others use this service, they attract cutting edge users and social media addicts – the early adopters of new technologies. Charging them for usage will diminish its popularity.

Is there a business model for Twitter? Open and honest, the only way I see Twitter making money is if they create an enterprise offering. Currently there is no major barrier of entry for twitter competitors. Twitter is a young, unstable platform, and any attempt to charge for it in its current state will be a huge mistake.


Bookmark Me

AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Add to Technorati Favorites

Top Posts

Kfir Pravda's Facebook profile

Archives

Some del.icio.us love!